Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl - 3DS - WiiU

on 6/15/2012, 9:44 am

Noooo... Zoroark is the new pokemon challenger; instead of Lucario, but it still rocks...
Megaman sure gonna be brawling because i heard(read) some news about a capcom character was going to appear.

on 6/15/2012, 11:18 am

shulk i wan't shulk in ssbb4

and did anybody think of how there gonna make the new link with out his boomerang it might just be the whip now, you'll get what i'm saying if you played skyward sword

on 6/15/2012, 2:44 pm

They barely know what they want to do for this game, I doubt there can be this many rumours.

on 6/15/2012, 3:36 pm

lol there aren't.

on 6/15/2012, 10:31 pm

These aren't rumors. They're desires.

on 6/15/2012, 10:35 pm

Saulgp wrote:Megaman sure gonna be brawling because i heard(read) some news about a capcom character was going to appear.

lol that rumors been floating around since brawl was announced

on 6/15/2012, 10:40 pm

Saulgp wrote:Megaman sure gonna be brawling because i heard(read) some news about a capcom character was going to appear.

lol that rumor's been floating around since brawl was announced.

on 6/15/2012, 10:41 pm

Saulgp wrote:Megaman sure gonna be brawling because i heard(read) some news about a capcom character was going to appear.

lol that rumor's been floating around since brawl was announced.

on 6/16/2012, 9:09 pm

Nice triple-post.

on 6/16/2012, 9:51 pm

now you see how bad my connection is......

on 6/17/2012, 6:28 am

@5h0ck wrote:

Saulgp wrote:Megaman sure gonna be brawling because i heard(read) some news about a capcom character was going to appear.

lol that rumor's been floating around since brawl was announced.

nooo, lalallalalaallaa i didn´t see anything...... megaman NEEDS to appear this time I...will kill you

btw, your connection rules.....

on 6/18/2012, 9:47 am

I just wish they'd use Mii's (which should be similar to Mario) with the Mario Kart Wii voices.

on 6/22/2012, 5:33 pm

WHAT IS THIS SORCERY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0TcnMoILig&feature=g-all-c

on 6/22/2012, 9:42 pm

@NS01 wrote:WHAT IS THIS SORCERY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0TcnMoILig&feature=g-all-c

on 6/22/2012, 10:00 pm

Yeah don't post like that again

on 6/23/2012, 8:30 am

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

on 6/23/2012, 10:11 am

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

on 6/23/2012, 4:15 pm

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

So the word "cry" isn't a word?

on 6/23/2012, 4:23 pm

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

So the word "cry" isn't a word?

It was an emote, and even if I were to count it as one, that'd be only one word whereas you need a minimum of 3 words.
Stop arguing already.

on 6/23/2012, 5:04 pm

@NS01 wrote:WHAT IS THIS SORCERY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0TcnMoILig&feature=g-all-c

no. Just no. This better be some sick, sick joke Nintendo is playing on us.

on 6/23/2012, 5:06 pm

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

You mean > 3 words, sorry just being nitpicky.
Back to topic though

on 6/23/2012, 5:18 pm

@Granadico wrote:

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

You mean > 3 words, sorry just being nitpicky.
Back to topic though

No, his post had one word that's < 3 not > 3 >.>

on 6/23/2012, 5:50 pm

oh i thought you said it had to have > 3 words, i read it wrong D:

on 6/23/2012, 6:58 pm

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:

@AaronKun wrote:

Mami-San wrote:Yeah don't post like that again

Chill. It's a valid response.

No it's not.
I've already stated emotes won't count towards word counts, so your post has < 3 words which is against the rules.

So the word "cry" isn't a word?

It was an emote, and even if I were to count it as one, that'd be only one word whereas you need a minimum of 3 words.
Stop arguing already.

Relax buttercup. No need to get annoyed.

on 6/23/2012, 7:10 pm

I'm not annoyed in the slightest.